Self-assessment · Reg. (EU) 2024/1689
Ten questions covering logging (Art. 12), quality management (Art. 17), documentation retention (Art. 18), and adjacent obligations under Articles 50, 72, and 73. Designed for compliance leads and ML governance owners at providers of high-risk AI systems under Annex III.
Runs entirely in your browser. No answers, scores, or organization details are transmitted, stored, or logged. Closing this tab erases the session. Article tags are revealed only after you answer each question, to keep the diagnostic honest. This assessment explains what Articles 12, 17 and 18 require of you; it does not establish that any particular tool satisfies them, because those obligations apply to the high-risk AI system as a whole.
Readiness score · Art. 12 / 17 / 18 self-assessment
Reference date. High-risk provisions of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 apply from 2 December 2027 (Article 113, deferred from 2 August 2026 by the EU Digital Omnibus). This assessment is a working aid, not legal advice.
What this assessment does not tell you: whether any particular tool satisfies Article 12. Those obligations apply to the high-risk AI system as a whole, so the next step is to read Article 12 itself and settle scope and sufficiency with qualified counsel and your notified body.
If you want one engineering pattern for the evidence side, PRML records evaluation criteria as tamper-evident manifests. Its coverage is partial: it supports specific logging controls, contributes partially to Article 17 records and Article 73 incident detection, and leaves other articles out of scope. The working pattern states those limits in full.